Hi All, I get following placement from the default...
# openlanet
Tayyeb Mahmood
05/22/2021, 2:28 PMHi All, I get following placement from the default hardening script of user_proj_example. Can an expert guide me how to relax this placement such that cells are more sparse. This design is too difficult to route.
h
Hieu Bui
05/22/2021, 3:25 PMI have had the same issue with the default script. You can try to disable PL_BASIC_PLACEMENT, enable PL_ROUTABILITY_DRIVEN and different values of PL_TARGET_DENSITY.
m
Matt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:18 AMI'd be concerned that your tools are not installed correctly. The example project script should work with no errors.
t
Tayyeb Mahmood
05/23/2021, 7:27 AMIt is no error, instead the placement is beautiful. Only it is too congested to be routed. I was looking for a method that can make this placement more sparse, to help routing.
m
Matt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:27 AMIf it's too congested to be routed, then isn't that an error?
Matt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:28 AMWhe you run make user_proj_example and then make user_project_wrapper, do you get a clean result?
Matt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:29 AMNo DRC no lvs
t
Tayyeb Mahmood
05/23/2021, 7:31 AMThis screenshot is of a modified user_prog_example build. I am unable to route it in reasonable time. Consider this as one of the design to be hardened as in your multi project example.
m
Matt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:33 AMSo above when you say it's the default, that's not true?
Matt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:34 AMNot trying to be snarky but you should try to be as clear as possible when asking for help. O
t
Tayyeb Mahmood
05/23/2021, 7:36 AMSorry I meant default configuration script, config.tcl
m
Matt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:38 AMyeah, no problem. But there are lots of issues that can be side products of a tool install gone wrong, and then it wastes everyone's time trying to work out what the issue is when it's that the tools are bad
Matt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:38 AMso a default run with user_proj_example should always work otherwise there is something badly wrong
Matt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:38 AMso back to your q
Matt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:41 AMtry decreasing
PL_TARGET_DENSITYMatt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:41 AM(default is 0.55)
Matt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:41 AMOr increase
CELL_PADMatt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:42 AMdefault is 4
t
Tayyeb Mahmood
05/23/2021, 7:43 AMTried first option, it yields a tiny island of cells in a big ocean placement remains same.
Tayyeb Mahmood
05/23/2021, 7:44 AMLet's try cell_pad
m
Matt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:45 AMAlso, I've had success with @Hieu Bui’s suggestion of PL_BASIC_PLACEMENT
Matt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:46 AMalso, try decreasing FP_CORE_UTIL (only has effect if your die size is not absolute)
Matt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:46 AMI would put a bunch of these into a configuration script and use run_designs to try all combos
Matt Venn
05/23/2021, 7:46 AMthen check the resulting spreadsheet to guide you
t
Tayyeb Mahmood
05/23/2021, 9:44 AMApparently, turning off PL_BASIC_PLACEMENT was the best option, and there is good reason to do so. I will write in detail to help others on this forum but for now thanks a lot @Hieu Bui and @Matt Venn
🙌 1
2 Views