I tried to create a .tek file from IHP's pdk for ASITIC using this code as a basis https://github.com/yrrapt/inductor-generator/blob/main/asitic/sky130.tek Sadly the simulations from ASITIC and openEMS seem to be VERY different (Q of >18 on ASITIC and Q=~4 in openEMS @ 2.4GHz). I think the main difference is in the Rseries result but I can't seem to pinpoint the cause. @Krzysztof Herman

Hi, did you figure out what was the problem? maybe check the dimensions again for sheet resistance. for e.g. about M1, I calculated 0.11ohm/sq, but the .tek file is 110. you can use this for converting conductivity to sheet resistance. https://www.suragus.com/en/technology/sheet-resistance-calculator/

@Daniel Barrios unfortunately I can not support you because I do not know ASITIC and nobody who could help. Maybe try to ask the developers.

@Ali Olyanasab Not yet, I was guessing the tek file used mOhm/sq as it appeared in the github. Also that would've meant the series resistance is even lower on ASITIC, resulting in an even higher Q, which is not the case.

@Daniel Barrios In your ASITIC tek file, there is a mistake with the substrate losses. The value must be given in Ohm*cm, so it would be