HI, Does anyone know what the error is due to in t...
# lvs
j
HI, Does anyone know what the error is due to in the LVS, read the pins in both files, try flattening and neither
@Tim Edwards
m
Looks like your schematic buses are all shorted in the layout. eg. schematic
Copy code
XC1[3] Fin net2[3] sky130_fd_pr__cap_mim_m3_1 W=30 L=23.42 MF=1 m=1
XC1[2] Fin net2[2] sky130_fd_pr__cap_mim_m3_1 W=30 L=23.42 MF=1 m=1
XC1[1] Fin net2[1] sky130_fd_pr__cap_mim_m3_1 W=30 L=23.42 MF=1 m=1
XC1[0] Fin net2[0] sky130_fd_pr__cap_mim_m3_1 W=30 L=23.42 MF=1 m=1
Layout
Copy code
X28 Fin m3_9990_43600# sky130_fd_pr__cap_mim_m3_1 l=2.342e+07u w=3e+07u
X31 Fin m3_9990_43600# sky130_fd_pr__cap_mim_m3_1 l=2.342e+07u w=3e+07u
X6 Fin m3_9990_43600# sky130_fd_pr__cap_mim_m3_1 l=2.342e+07u w=3e+07u
X9 Fin m3_9990_43600# sky130_fd_pr__cap_mim_m3_1 l=2.342e+07u w=3e+07u
cap_mim
devices are only reduced in parallel.
s
In connections like the one shown in picture xschem creates 4 distinct nets between C1[3:0] and C2[3:0]. If this is not desired and you want to short together the capacitors place a unique label on the net.
1.png
j
I don't understand the difference, since they are connected, there shouldn't be the same 4 capacitor connections from home, which in the end will generate individual parallels?
this can give the error of the instances??
One question, I did what was recommended and match uniquely comes out, but on the Netgen page it says that it should also come out correctly, what is needed for it to come out like this?
s
The capacitor arrangments shown in picture are different. The first should not match the second. If you don't set a label on the center net xschem assumes netxxx[3:0], so 4 different nets.
👍 1