*<3 new commits> pushed to <https://github.com/RTi...
# open_pdks
g
3 new commits pushed to `master` `60d84c21` - Added the layouts used for DRC ruleset development to sky130/custom/drc/. `e60b486f` - Corrected the "short" model which is actually being called as a `22ff74f7` - Corrected "corelocali" layer rules so that magic does not raise RTimothyEdwards/open_pdks
m
@Tim Edwards I was looking at the recent changes to the
sky130/magic/sky130.tech
file. Looks like the
w
parameter for some of the poly resistors may has been removed. Is this intentional?
git diff 1.0.67 origin/master
Copy code
device rsubcircuit sky130_fd_pr__res_high_po_0p35 xhrpoly \
-    xpc pwell,space/w error +res0p35 l=l w=w
+    xpc pwell,space/w error +res0p35 l=l
 device rsubcircuit sky130_fd_pr__res_high_po_0p69 xhrpoly \
-    xpc pwell,space/w error +res0p69 l=l w=w
+    xpc pwell,space/w error +res0p69 l=l
 device rsubcircuit sky130_fd_pr__res_high_po_1p41 xhrpoly \
-    xpc pwell,space/w error +res1p41 l=l w=w
+    xpc pwell,space/w error +res1p41 l=l
 device rsubcircuit sky130_fd_pr__res_high_po_2p85 xhrpoly \
-    xpc pwell,space/w error +res2p85 l=l w=w
+    xpc pwell,space/w error +res2p85 l=l
 device rsubcircuit sky130_fd_pr__res_high_po_5p73 xhrpoly \
-    xpc pwell,space/w error +res5p73 l=l w=w
+    xpc pwell,space/w error +res5p73 l=l
 device rsubcircuit sky130_fd_pr__res_high_po   xhrpoly \
    xpc pwell,space/w error l=l w=w
 device rsubcircuit sky130_fd_pr__res_xhigh_po_0p35 uhrpoly \
-    xpc pwell,space/w error +res0p35 l=l w=w
+    xpc pwell,space/w error +res0p35 l=l
 device rsubcircuit sky130_fd_pr__res_xhigh_po_0p69 uhrpoly \
-    xpc pwell,space/w error +res0p69 l=l w=w
+    xpc pwell,space/w error +res0p69 l=l
 device rsubcircuit sky130_fd_pr__res_xhigh_po_1p41 uhrpoly \
-    xpc pwell,space/w error +res1p41 l=l w=w
+    xpc pwell,space/w error +res1p41 l=l
 device rsubcircuit sky130_fd_pr__res_xhigh_po_2p85 uhrpoly \
-    xpc pwell,space/w error +res2p85 l=l w=w
+    xpc pwell,space/w error +res2p85 l=l
 device rsubcircuit sky130_fd_pr__res_xhigh_po_5p73 uhrpoly \
-    xpc pwell,space/w error +res5p73 l=l w=w
+    xpc pwell,space/w error +res5p73 l=l
 device rsubcircuit sky130_fd_pr__res_xhigh_po   uhrpoly \
    xpc pwell,space/w error l=l w=w
t
@Mitch Bailey: Yes, it is. SkyWater defines five specific valid widths for the high-res and ultra-high-res poly resistors. Each one has its own model. Since the model already embeds the width, it is not valid to pass a width to the subcircuit. At best it would be ignored.
m
@Tim Edwards Thanks for the explanation.