and why L=150000u ? I thought maybe L=0.13u (130...
# xschem
p
and why L=150000u ? I thought maybe L=0.13u (130nm) or some smaller values than the current value would be more suitable
t
Possibly the 130nm name of the process corresponds to the actual gate length after subtracting deltas, or else SkyWater might do a die shrink, which is a common method.
r
130nm is right at the start of the era where the node name stopped corresponding to any physical measurements