Regarding the xschem symbols, I know that <@U01819...
# analog-design
y
Regarding the xschem symbols, I know that @User was making some symbols. Was just digital cells I think when I saw his post weeks ago but maybe there's more now.
s
I started weeks ago an analog library for Xschem in addition to the digital library. I stopped since at the time there was no sufficient information yet. I have seen that data is much more defined now, so i wil continue the work. If someone has any useful information to make the job easier (for example where to look for the right information, since sometimes i find myself wasting time looking in the wrong places) i will really appreciate :-).
p
I would like to see a response from @Tim Edwards on this. I think he is the one who wrote that section of the docs so he must have gotten the symbol pictures somewhere. It would be a shame to duplicate the work if he already has an "official" symbol set he can share.
t
@Patrick Van Oosterwijck(@Stefan Schippers): The symbol drawings are literally just images ripped out of a SkyWater Word document. But since I want/need symbols anyway in an open source format, I'd prefer that there be an xschem (open source!) library and that we generate images from that.
s
Making the symbol graphics is the least problematic thing, the important thing is to know device by device the set of attributes they need. I think now most of the info is available, thanks to some info from @Tim Edwards weeks ago and the improving documentation. Another interesting work is validation. being these the lowest level objects in an analog design these components must be ultra-verified.
p
Thanks for clarifying @Tim Edwards, I just wanted to avoid unnecessary duplication of work in case the symbols already existed.