Hello everyone, I wanted to do the layout of a cap...
# ieee-sscs-dc-22
s
Hello everyone, I wanted to do the layout of a capacitor bank in Magic. When I select Devices2--mim cap (metal4) with connect bottom plates or top plates or both in an array (10x6) , the width of metal 5 gets wider or its location varies. Is it really important which one I choose for my layout? It's not clear to me what the differences between them are. Thanks.
t
I think this is an error in the parameterized device generator Tcl script. I will post an issue for it in the issue tracker, but I'm not sure when I can get around to looking into it. A workaround is to not select the "connect top plates" option for the device, and then connect the top plates together yourself, in the parent cell.
It would help if you could provide any one set of parameters that results in an incorrect layout, so that I can quickly reproduce the error.
s
Hi Tim, Thank you for your response. Is it necessary to have metal5 in the right side of the mimcap? Is there any specific reason for it? Moreover, When I choose bottom plate connection in a 2x2 array, there are DRC violations due to the metal5 space. It seems that the bottom plate connection doesn't work as well. Thanks
t
I think the bottom and top place connections are based on the same equations, so it's not surprising that they are both incorrect. There is no particular reason to put the contact off to the right, but the general rule of MiM caps is that they act much like transistor gates with respect to antenna violations, and while SkyWater doesn't call out any specific antenna rules related to MiM caps in their DRC deck, the general practice is to always contact from the bottom plate of the MiM cap upward, and never downward. Arrays of MiM caps then will have alternating stripes contacting (bottom, top, bottom, top, bottom, ...). Also, there are often rules about the maximum area of a bottom plate which makes it more usual for each MiM cap in an array to have its own isolated bottom plate. Again, SkyWater does not have such a rule, but I copied and modified the MiM cap drawing routines from another process that does. Like any layout drawing tool, the parameterized cells are "helper" functions, and you are welcome to draw your own device in whatever way you prefer, as long as it passes DRC rules.