Hi @Tim Edwards @Stefan Schippers Can you please clarify to me why this difference between Xschem and MAGIC, please?

For one, the width of the 0p35 resistor should not have been allowed to be 0.69, or even editable in magic's parameter window. I'm not sure what happened there.

Thanks @Tim Edwards.I corrected it. However, the resistor's value in XSCHEM equals 37..68KOhms and the value of the same resistor in MAGIC reaches 38.226kOhms. Is there a reason for this difference? which one is correct, please?

The one in xschem is probably just the resistivity times the length divided by the width. The one in magic includes the endcap resistances.

Thanks I got it.

@Ahmed Reda the resistance value shown in xschem is just Rho * L / W as @Tim Edwards explained. The exact resistance is a complex equation that depends on the voltage difference and temperature (plus endcaps, also described by a complex equation).

@Stefan Schippers I got it. Thank you

So the xschem version is a "mostly accurate" value, the magic version is a "slightly more accurate value", and the only way to get a truly accurate value is through simulation, specifying all conditions.

@Tim Edwards @Stefan Schippers Really, thank you.