<@U016EM8L91B>, I'm still getting this PNP LVS issue. Is it still broken or is it me? I updated th...
t
@User, I'm still getting this PNP LVS issue. Is it still broken or is it me? I updated the PDK yesterday. Please see the attached report etc.
The issue I'm seeing is that even though in Magic I've instantiated the
sky130_fd_pr__pnp_05v5_W3p40L3p40
it's being extracted as
sky130_fd_pr__pnp_05v5
.
t
PNPs installed by open_pdks are supposed to create a .mag view that has the "pnp3p40" layer painted over the base area, which tells magic to extract the device with the _W3p40L3p40 extension.
t
I found the problem, @Tim Edwards. I was using
sky130_fd_pr__pnp_05v5_W3p40L3p40.mag
rather than the one with
rf
in the name. I guess the first one doesn't have that layer you were talking about maybe? Anyway. Thanks for alerting me
t
Yes, the one without "rf" is unusable because it has the same name as the subcircuit model.
👍 1