@mehdi In today’s meeting, we answered a few questions. There was one design that had errors in cace simulation. @Tim Edwards looked at it and found that there were no labels in the layout. The designer is looking into the problem and will report back. Another question was about the layer mapping and why the

mimcap

in sky130 is between

met3

and

met4

, but glayout uses met4 and met5. Explained that glayout uses virtual layers where

li

is mapped to

met1

and all the other `via`/`met` layers are shifted by one. There was also a question about how to support both `met3`/`met4` mimcap and `met4`/`met5` `mimcap`s since sky130 has both.

@Danielle Marinese / @Mitch Bailey could we have the recording of the meeting posted as well please ?

@Sud_ana Sure! Danielle will post when she’s back.

Thanks! @Chetanya Goyal FYI.

Will look at this further thanks