Robin Tsang
04/13/2024, 5:47 PMLucas Daudt Franck
04/13/2024, 5:58 PM.option KLU
? I'm not sure if it helps but maybe give it a try.Robin Tsang
04/13/2024, 7:55 PM.option KLU
, makes no observable difference. Thank you for the suggestion.Robin Tsang
04/13/2024, 10:01 PMcombined
models instead of the ngspice
models, and .option KLU
Thanks @Lucas Daudt FranckLucas Daudt Franck
04/13/2024, 10:16 PMngspice
models to make the simulation work with them, but the results I'm getting are a complete mess.Lucas Daudt Franck
04/13/2024, 10:18 PMRobin Tsang
04/13/2024, 10:20 PMngspice
models and combined
models. There may be an extra substrate connection which can really throw things off. I ran into it when swithing to combined
models for pnp. The pnp in combined
models have an extra substrate connection and the xschem symbol in the pdk doesn't netlist out that extra substrate node. I had to create my own pnp symbol to properly get it netlisted so it works with combined
.Lucas Daudt Franck
04/13/2024, 10:27 PMRobin Tsang
04/13/2024, 10:33 PMcombined
except the diodes, I would switch out the combined
models just for the diodes for ngspice
models. Good luck.Robin Tsang
04/13/2024, 11:11 PMabstol
in order for rcx simulations to run. For example, if I set abstol=1e-4
a certain delay (which I'm measuring to meet a spec) can change from 0.78ms to 1.19ms. This is on a schematic netlist. Only noticed this when trying to run rcx because I never had to change abstol
.Lucas Daudt Franck
04/13/2024, 11:18 PMcombined
models.
Actually, my entire extracted circuit is a mess 😅. They were just antenna diodes, so they weren't supposed to interfere with the circuit operation.
Well, it seems I'll have to dig deeper. The layout is LVS and DRC clean, but I'm getting almost a 50% variation from the schematic simulation (without parasitics).Robin Tsang
04/14/2024, 1:00 AMLucas Daudt Franck
04/14/2024, 1:09 AMRobin Tsang
04/14/2024, 1:37 AMLucas Daudt Franck
04/14/2024, 12:40 PM